JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 28, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Corporacion Financiera Del Pacifico·Respondent Tribunal Adtvo. De Cundinamarca Secc. 2

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Por Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de la referencia a la Corporación Financiera del Pacífico S.A. –en liquidación–, para interponga nuevamente la acción de tutela, según las reglas Constitucionales vigentes y lo dispuesto en el Decreto 2591 de 1991, toda vez que se le dio aplicación al Art. 1° del Decreto 1382 de 2000 que es contrario a la Carta Política.

En consecuencia, se ordenó comunicar de esta decisión al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca y a la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REMITIR el expediente de la referencia a la Corporacion Financiera del Pacifico S.A. -en liquidacion-, para que esta, si asi lo desea, la interponga nuevamente, segun las reglas Constitucionales vigentes y lo dispuesto en el Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR la presente decision al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca y a la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.